Don't know about you - but if you're Indian, like me, whatever your political orientation, you ought to be feeling deeply disturbed at the sort of  photo up above, of "President" George W Bush with "Prime Minister" Manmohan Singh.

All right, I know, both these characters are illegitimately occupying their seats. Neither has been elected to his position and each is a puppet controlled by a fairly well known source of power. But still, while Bush has been repudiated by most of the American people, Singh continues to be the darling of middle class India, so he, at least, can claim to be representing India. All right so far?

Well, then, I am not happy to see the prime minister (if only notional) of India smiling subserviently while Bush pats him a pet dog. It's - however - a perfect illustration of the relationship between these two mountebanks.

So, I’m not at all surprised that Manmohan Singh’s making such a hullabaloo out of his “nuclear deal” and that he’s been caught out in lies – contradicted by a State Department staffer, a flunky, no less. Since he’s been caught out in one lie, one wonders how many more there are…and several are so glaringly obvious that one can only conclude the media are deliberately ignoring them.

First, the usual claim is that the Nuclear Deal will solve all our energy problems. Some of the votaries of the deal, in the first burst of enthusiasm, claimed immediate energy benefits from the deal. As, slowly, reality seeped in, they agreed reluctantly that the deal would have the benefits, take care of all our problems, and so on – but only a couple of decades down the line. All right, let’s say, in a couple of decades - so will the Nuclear Deal solve those problems?

Of course not.

Power from nuclear energy supplies just 4,120 megawatts, that’s less than 3%, of India’s power output. Even if all the planned nuclear plants materialise, and function at maximum capacity (more on that in a moment), nuclear origin power will supply no more than seven percent of our power by 2050. That’s the reality of “energy security”.

Then, the second claim is that nuclear energy is clean, efficient and cheap. Balderdash. Nuclear plants may not emit spumes of charcoal smoke like thermal power plants, but they leave highly toxic wastes for which there is no known disposal method that works; especially in the Indian context, where radiation leaks (as at Jadugoda) are common, the effects on people living around the plants will be nothing short of horrendous. So much for “clean”. Now for “efficient”. The Indian Atomic Energy Department set a target of 43,500 megawatts of power from nuclear reactors by 2000, that was seven years ago. To date, as I pointed out, it has achieved 4,120 MW. Brilliant efficiency. In fact, worldwide, nuclear power systems are inefficient and unsafe. And as for cost - the Massachsetts Institute of Technology said nuclear power costs 40 to 60 % more than gas or coal powered systems. Did I hear someone say "cheap"?

Then, the lies go on, the Nuclear Deal won’t have any effect on India’s independent foreign policy. Who are they kidding? It’s already had an effect, long before taking hold – remember how India voted alongside America against Iran, not just once but twice, last year? Even when the country could have abstained, even when non-aligned countries abstained or voted against America, India went ahead and voted against Iran. Don’t tell me voting against a near neighbour against whom no evidence has ever been presented was something India did naturally.  

So, nuclear power is insufficient to meet our needs, and it is also unsafe, inefficient, expensive, and dirty, besides compromising our foreign policy. So just why is it that the government of India is determined to institute this agreement?

It’s because of the last point. The Nuclear Deal has, obviously, nothing to do with energy security – but it has everything to do with turning India into a vassal of the US empire.

You see, the vermin who run this government have one dear wish – to turn India into an American appendage and loyal camp follower. Every foreign policy initiative they have taken since coming to power has been geared to that end. First came joint exercises between the USAF and the Indian Air Force, and that was followed by American troops being trained in the Indian counterinsurgency school at Vairengte in Mizoram – from where they went off to murder innocent civilians in Iraq. Meanwhile India pledged to support the highly destabilising and unworkable American missile defence systems, and again began raising the possibility of sending Indian troops abroad (if not to Iraq then at least to Afghanistan) to help in the “war on terror”. And then came the purchase of American C130 transports and the troop landing ship USS Trenton, a museum piece discarded by the American Navy. Meanwhile, the Americans also bid to sell India F16s and F18s, apart from other military hardware, and in another blog I shall discuss why they are almost certain to win that order. Then the American carrier USS Nimitz docked at Chennai and its crew were given the freedom of the city without even the formalities of passport and visa, the government falling over itself to declare it didn’t have any nuclear weapons on board (a claim its own officers didn’t make). The Nimitz and the Kitty Hawk, another carrier, are due back in Indian waters next month to “exercise” with the Indian Navy before going off to bomb Iraq or maybe Iran.

Yes, this government is determined to make India as much an American vassal as, for instance, Thailand. The stakes are huge.

Why are the stakes huge? With the amount of money involved, the gigantic sums floating around, and historical Indian tendencies to kowtow to the foreigner, do you really need to ask?

I know that Manmohan Singh is a professional liar, but it’s time to come clean. It’s a pity that the only genuine opposition in the country – the Left – hasn’t pulled the plug on this crooked regime yet.

Until it does, Bush can continue patting his simpering blue-turbaned lapdog, who’s proudly announced that he’s been invited by Bush to Crawford and will ride in a golf cart with the Master Of The Universe.

Watch this space.

I think there isn’t anyone among the regulars on my blog who’s unaware of my feelings about the Bush imperium and about imperialism in general. I’ve been writing now for years – since September 2001 at least – of the particular danger posed by the United States of America to the world at large, and I’ve repeatedly pointed out the fact that in my own considered opinion the planet, as a living entity, cannot continue to tolerate the existence of the US in its present form.

Does that, however, make me anti-American, as I’m accused, virtually on a daily basis, of being?

No.

What is being anti-American, anyway? Am I against the soil of the United States? Am I against grizzly bears, coyotes, and redwoods? Am I supposed to oppose the existence of the Gila Monster or the Grand Canyon (and never mind – just for a moment - the US Rangers there being forbidden to mention its geological origins)? 

It’s easy to say, like so many of my interlocutors on Orkut and other websites, that “All Americans are evil,” “all Americans should be killed, “the only good American is a dead American,” and so on. Most of the people who say this are immature and semi-educated, but not all; most of them are Muslim, and of a fundamentalist bent of mind, but not all. I’ve known white Australians with college degrees and of impeccably Christian heritage who refused to even write the word “America” properly.

These people aren’t insincere in their viewpoints. When they say “All Americans are evil” they mean what they say. They’re just not adequately informed. They’re also excellent propaganda copy for the enemy; because don’t imagine the Bush cabal doesn’t know about them, and doesn’t use them as fodder in its “They hate our freedoms” campaign.

Before I go further, let me clearly state my position, so there isn’t any confusion over what I’m saying.

I hate the government of the United States of America, its armed forces, its social and economic system, its foreign policy, and its continuing attempts to impose its ownership over the world. There is nothing I would like better than to see all this destroyed.

I do not hate the people of the United States, its tradition – now imperilled – of free thought and dissent. I do not hate even the most retrogressive, the most hidebound denizen of the Bible Belt, because – unlike the “America to the gallows” crowd – I do know a little of what I am talking about.

Americans have done a hell of a lot of horrible things, and continue to do a lot of horrible things. They – even if nothing else mattered –live so wastefully that if we all did the same, we would need six more Earths just to supply the resources. They do have a government, which they (by common perception) voted to power which is hell bent on turning the rest of the world into slaves. Granted.

But…

Take another look.

The average American is brainwashed systematically from birth to believe that his/her country is the greatest in the world, that the nation’s authority flows from “god”, that the country stands for “good”, that anyone opposing it must be therefore evil, that everyone loves America, and that since America is the centre of the universe nothing else is really worth knowing. The average American is carefully guided into these beliefs by being kept systematically ignorant, especially in these days of “intelligent design” and “teach the controversy”, of science and logical thinking; he or she is force fed TV trash till what is on TV becomes the perceived reality. A nation where museums can exist that posit that humans and dinosaurs co-existed, or where the Grand Canyon’s geological history is suppressed, cannot be considered a nation looking at modernity. A nation where the price of petrol (“gasoline”) becomes the benchmark of foreign policy success cannot be considered a modern society.

So when this American who has never been taught to think for himself, who has been force fed the notion of the infallibility of Genesis, who has been brainwashed into believing that his nation is the greatest on earth and is beloved of all except “evildoers”, is suddenly confronted with the truth, that is, that America is not the most loved nation in the world, but rather the most hated; that the rest of the world does not want to live as American vassals; and that US power is not universally applicable, and that not everyone thinks “god” made the world in six days and rested on the seventh, he is faced with a stupendous intellectual shock.

What then is easier but to delude this wretched individual into the belief that he does not see what he is seeing, but that this is all the result of a conspiracy by “liberals”, “faggots”, “commies” and other traitors? Especially when you control the media, and where these individuals have only the media as their window on the world?

Of course, this American is also likely to be a person of limited economic means, and therefore of limited access to independent information or education, and he is likely to be kept there in that economic bracket. He will be encouraged to buy on credit and not save at all; in his employment, he will be deprived of the right to form effective unions so that he can be kept under further control by not having economic security; and as far as his health is concerned, he will not be able to afford any real care without expensive and often unaffordable insurance. All this will go to keeping him exactly where he is.

He has democracy, sure – he has the right to vote for either the Republicans or the Democrats, between whom one would need an electron microscope to distinguish, and who follow exactly the same policies on virtually every issue one can name, even if they were voted to power to do the exact opposite. 

All this is not quite enough, so you also have warrantless arrests, the deliberate fomenting of fear and a siege mentality, the poisonous military industrial complex, the USA Patriot Act and  similar legislation, all designed to keep the population – including our putative American - in a state of permanent and voluntary subjugation.

Does this American, therefore, look like a monster any more? Doesn’t he begin to look like just another victim?

What amazes me, frankly, is that this American, despite all that is going against him, can’t be kept down. You can do your worst, but the American still can’t be fooled all of the time.

When the US dropped more bombs on the inoffensive neutral nation of Cambodia than were dropped in all of World War II and napalmed Vietnamese villages, who stormed the streets with slogans like “Hey Hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”

Americans.

When the US was actively planning the invasion of Iraq, which everyone outside the US knew had neither WMDs nor links to Al Qaeda, who – despite it being “unpatriotic” then – came on the streets in their hundreds of thousands to protest the planned invasion even before it happened?

Americans.

Just, as a piece of perspective for Indians – can you imagine any of us marching on the streets to protest an Indian invasion of Sri Lanka, for example, as actually happened in 1987?       

Who risked their careers, when they did not have to, to protest the mass murders of Iraqi and Afghan civilians? Who are the Dixie Chicks, Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn? Who are Cindy Sheehan, Eric Blumrich, or our very own Malcolm Mills? 

Americans.

Can you, my fellow Indians, imagine Amitabh Bacchhan or Lata Mangeshkar protesting the murder of Kashmiri civilians by Indian troops?

Who was it that insisted on the individual’s right to oppose governments, even governments at war, and went to jail rather than pay taxes that would go to support an illegal war? Henry David Thoreau, in my own opinion one of the greatest philosophers since Socrates, and he was an American, too.

And another question – yes, the American government and its corporate cronies are vile beyond comprehension. Yes, they would be glad to batten upon us and suck us dry. Yes, they think they own the world. But can they actually, by themselves, impose their will on all of us?

Who the hell do these murderous parasites work through? Isn’t it our own governments, our own “leaders”, who follow their orders and let them in through the door? When farmers commit mass suicide and Manmohan Singh (who came to power promising an independent foreign policy and left of centre economics) parrots economic policies written down for him by the World Bank, when he betrays our old friend Iran by voting – not once by twice – against it in the IAEA in order to please Washington, when he throws our ports and air space open to American military units, what price anti-Americanism? Why don’t we rise up, pull this Quisling out of his office and hang him by his own intestines from the lamp-posts? Until we destroy the compradors and fifth columnists among us, do we have a right to blame it all on Washington?

Of course it’s easy to do that. Blame the Americans. It’s easy to do for the same reason that it’s easy for the Bushies to claim that anyone who hates the US does that because he “hates their freedoms”.

Ignorance and chauvinism make the worst of all combinations.